Grumpy Old Granny

“Buddy, I don`t really care what your problem is. Just don`t make it mine.” -Pixie by Ani DiFranco

There once was a grumpy old granny

She lived far away from the woods

Out in the desert so sunny

That’s where she peddled her goods

She peddled her hate

and spread her misery

Any person would rate

as far as she could see

A bitter old hag

with a curdled old heart

So ugly a bag

Over her head’s a good start

She claimed to be pure

Yet poison was all she did spread

She wasn’t quite sure

Why her family wished she was dead

Grumpy old granny had no friends

She never did learn the lesson

That hatred just ends

With nothing but dying alone

So, that’s a limerick I wrote for some spiteful, ugly-souled bitch who felt compelled to troll my wife online and tell my wife she was evil for being married to me, for loving me. As far as I can tell, this granny out of the South West–no doubt a big Joe Arpaio fan–is one of those hypocritical right-wing Republican Christians I utterly despise. Someone who claims to be Christian but ignores Christ’s teachings in order to cast aspersions at people without any basis. Like the Ani Difranco song, “Pixie”, I`m very much “live and let live, and when they’re out for blood, I always give.” I was convicted of a horrendous crime, so I never hold any animosity toward anyone who wants to talk shit about me because of that conviction. However, when someone decides to talk shit to anyone I love, merely for the fact that they love me and support me, I`m not so forgiving. I`ll turn the other cheek when the attacks on me, but not when it’s on my family or friends.

I`m actually a really mellow guy whose excitement and passion comes out for the positive in life, when I have something positive to share, or I’ve got an idea I think can change the world for the better, or something is making people happy. However, I can’t stand anyone or anything that would hurt my loved one’s feelings, so my passion and excitement can be turned against people who espouse hate and try to hurt other people for no reason. My patience for ignorant people like Granny is usually damn near infinite, but my patience quickly runs thin when those like Grumpy Granny want to talk shit to my loved ones.

So, here’s some lessons for you, Granny. Judge not lest ye be judged. Love the sinner, hate the sin. Forgive your fellow human seventy times seven times. Take the beam out of your own eye before you worry about the mote in your neighbor’s eye. If you don`t have anything nice to say, don`t say anything at all.

Yeah, I know: I`m not heeding my own lessons by posting this little rant against Grumpy Granny, but people talking out of their asses for nothing but harming others pisses me off. My wife is a wonderful, kind, caring, sensitive, good human being who gave me a chance, looked beyond my past to see the man I actually am. Anyone who takes the time to get to know me knows that I am not evil, I`m not some heartless monster. I`m actually someone who cares about the world and the people in it. I`m a man who wants to change the world for the better, protect the downtrodden if I can, spread a message of love, peace, and tolerance. But just like Jesus with the moneychangers in the temple, I get upset when I see hateful behavior like Granny’s.

Of course, some people talked shit after my hearing, which is to be expected. One of those shit-talkers is good ol’ ex-detective Ramos, a worthless fame-whore who likes spouting off nonsense if it means he can get his crusty old mug on t.v. or his name in the paper. You should move to Hollywood, Ramos, ya washed up has-been. So, Ramos wanted to give his worthless opinion that I`m a “cold-blooded killer.” Here’s the thing, Ramos: you don`t know me. You didn`t know me back then, and you sure as hell don`t know me now. So your statement about me being a cold-blooded killer is completely baseless. For the record, I am not a cold-blooded killer. While I may convicted of murder, that was not a premeditated murder. I was blacked out, not in control of my actions, and I would never consciously choose to ever take a human life.  I will never again put myself in any situation where I would lose control of my mind (through drugs and/or alcohol), and I would actually gladly sacrifice myself to preserve life and protect others from harm if given the chance. I do all I can from in here, using my words to help others find peace and happiness in their lives. And what do you do? Chase fleeting fame and spread hate and discontent, profiteering off of other people’s misery.

Hey, Ramos, why don`t you tell the public why you made sure to let Dave Cash go free without a single day spent in jail even though in every other case like this one, where two people are at a crime scene and leave the crime scene together, both people always get charged with crimes? Why don`t you tell the public about zero physical evidence at the crime scene connecting me to the crime scene? And why don`t you tell everyone about the false confession you took from me that the Long Beach cops coerced me into using discredited and disavowed interrogation techniques, and how that false confession didn`t match the forensics? It seems to me that the man that would try so hard to put a kid on death row and let a psychopath go free because the dumb kid trusted in the system was the easier target…well it seems to me that such a man trying to kill a boy and let a psychopath go free is the true cold-blooded killer, especially when that man did it for a shot at fame.

Alright, that concludes my rant. Yes, I`m human. Yes, I can be affected by the slings and arrows of misfortune. I can get angry, but thankfully I don`t lose my temper and self-destruct like I did when I was a kid. These days if I get angry, I channel that anger into creative, positive, or self-improving pursuits. Angry at Grump Granny? Write a limerick about her. Angry at Ramos? Point out the truths he would rather remain hidden. For anyone out there who feels misjudged, wrong maligned or invisible to a world that is blind to your pain: if you feel anger inside of you, use that anger for good. Let it be the energy that drives you to push yourself to improve both yourself and the world around you. If they say you’re evil, show them you’re good. If they say you don`t deserve anything but pain and suffering, strive to bring joy and happiness to the world because that is the true curative.

I do want to clarify my comment about despising hypocritical right-wing Republican Christians. The operative word, and the true subject of my contempt, is “hypocritical.” Jesus taught love, forgiveness, and not judging your neighbors. So those who espouse hate, judgement, negativity, and retribution just for retribution’s sake, those are the people I hold in the lowest regard, especially when they simultaneously claim to be Christian. However, I have a great admiration for true Christians who espouse Christ’s teachings of love and forgiveness. So, if you’re a Christian who is reading this, and you feel hate in your heart toward me or anyone else, you need to re-examine the core of your belief system. Hate is toxic and destructive: it does nothing positive for anyone. Yes, hold strong in your convictions, but don`t inflict pain–emotional, mental, or physical–on anyone just for the sake of inflicting pain.

As for right-wing conservative Republicans, I share some of their beliefs about smaller government, free markets, and balanced budgets (though that last one seems to have fallen out of favor among the Republicans). I would define myself as Democratic libertarian. Socially, I don`t agree with right-wing conservative Republicans at all. I think a lot of them are misogynistic and racist, both of which I oppose. I`m pro-choice, anti-death penalty, and wholeheartedly believe in equal treatment for all people regardless of sex, race, sexual identity, religion, or beliefs. Regardless of my opposition to the ring-wing conservative Republican ideology, I don`t assume that someone with those beliefs is “evil” or fits any stereotype. Every human being is complex, with often-times conflicting beliefs, and everyone deserves to be known individually.

For me, the guiding principle in life is positivity, helping people to improve themselves and the world around them. I usually handle negativity and personal attacks with stoicism or an attempt to understand where that person is coming from with their negativity so I can help them find peace and happiness in their lives. Sometimes, though, there are people you can’t reason with, people who will spit in your face no matter what you say or do. And sometimes you have to speak out against those people, not only to defend yourself, your loved ones, and your beliefs, but to let those people know that kindness is not weakness. Those people whose ignorance and hate can’t be swayed with logic or kindness: fuck you. Everyone else: don`t be afraid to look past the headlines and seek the truth in any given situation. I know it’s hard to question your own initial assumptions, it can cause a cognitive dissonance, but you must think for yourselves and not be led blindly down a path people in power want you to walk down for their own benefit. And in your constant quest for truth and self-improvement, don`t ever let hate take the reins of your heart.

I write this for my wife, the love of my life whom I idolize, who is the kindest person I’ve ever met in my life, whom I love more than anything or anyone else in the world. Those who would grab their tiki-torches and pitchforks to sling mud at my wife or anything else who loves me or supports me, realize that my wife and the people on my side are the ones who would be the first to offer you a helping hand in your time of need. And the people who would inflame your passions against me are the same people who would turn the mob against you, too, if it would profit them in the least. Just don`t blindly swallow the pablum without at least questioning the source of the pablum itself.

Until next time, then, be vigilant against those who would use and manipulate you for their own means and ends. Question authority as no institution is infallible, and you the people are the only ones who can keep the media and government officials honest.

Panic at the (NYSE) disco

Today, February 5th, 2018, the stock market had a healthy sell-off. No investor likes to see a down day on Wall Street, much less a big down day like today, but that which goes up must come down. Today’s sell-off is just a breather, a return to more reasonable valuations, in what will prove to be the longest bull market in American history (well, up to this point in time). So, if you are an investor, stop, breathe, keep calm and invest on. The global economy is healthy, and the American economy is healthy. We have at least another nine months of steady economic expansion before inflationary pressures force the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates to the point where a bear market and recession are inevitable. Still, the pullback of the past week is an indicator that we are nearing the peak of this bull market. If you have cash on the sidelines, this is a good time to put your money in the U.S. stock market: you will get a nice return for the year. Happy investing, people!

Free Speech and Castration

I just got done reading the February, 2018, issue of Wired: it’s the speech issue about free speech in the age of today’s internet. An article by Virginia Heffernan, about a section of Reddit called “Change My View“, revolved around her personal view that serial sexual abusers should submit to castration. I’ve hyperlinked the Change My View subreddit because I think it’s a great concept: it’s a place you can post a specific view with the intent of giving others an opportunity to change that view through reasoned, civil debate and discourse. In my own life, I try to keep myself open to hearing opinions and viewpoints that aren’t in line with my own opinions and viewpoints in order that I don`t become so entrenched in my own beliefs that I`m closed off to hearing evidence that might disprove my own theories. That entrenchment would lead to mental atrophy and closing off of one’s self from opportunities for personal growth. That entrenchment would also lead to an inability to adequately defend one’s own position for any given belief.

Freedom of speech is an extremely important right to me. Not just because of my position in society as a prisoner with few other rights, but because it’s a fundamental right for every American, a bedrock of our democracy. Freedom of speech isn`t just about self-expression and the right to voice one’s opinions: it’s also about access to information and the right to hear other people’s opinions. So much of our ability to function in life and society is dependent upon freedom of speech, whatever form that speech may take. The internet has changed the meaning of speech, and the power dynamics for dissemination of information to the masses, since I’ve been in prison. Contemplating these changes makes me wonder why I write, what my purpose is in writing. To change the world for the better, for sure. But also to show my true self, as much as possible, in order to counteract all the negative things that have been written about me in the past. Also to inform and entertain while shining a light on the realities of life as a prisoner serving a sentence of life without the possibility of parole.

The power the internet can give to one voice is astounding, but the voice being amplified may speak ill as well as good. One voice can turn to many, and make or break real people in the real world. Which is where the castration part of this post comes in.  Ms. Heffernan’s view about castration (which she modified after posting to Change My View) brought to mind a story of a friend’s husband recently relayed to me by my wife. This friend’s husband was convicted of a sexual offense many years ago. I don`t know the particulars of his case, but I know he served many years in prison before finally being paroled recently.

It used to be that when someone committed a crime, they would be duly convicted, sentenced to prison, serve their time, then be released to rejoin society and lead a societally acceptable life after having paid that societal debt in the form of prison time. Now, because of the internet, nobody gets to move beyond their past when convicted of a felony. Their punishment continues even after their release from prison. Nobody gets it more, or worse, than convicted sex offenders; though the attitudes of society toward the convicted, overall, is pretty much uniform across most felonies. Our friend’s husband is a prime example of this.

So, this guy finally gets his chance at freedom after serving his time, after paying his debt to society. He gets a job as an administrative assistant, working in an office setting. Well, word gets out(via Facebook, Snapchat, or whatever) that he’s a convicted sex offender fresh out of prison, so people complain to his employer and he is fired. No doubt he’s on some sex offender registry where anyone can look him up and take it upon themselves to punish him for his crimes more than he’s already been punished.

Now, I fully understand not wanting any kind of criminal around anywhere they might be tempted to repeat their prior crimes, but I don`t understand the need to fully ostracize any ex-felon from society at large.  In the long-run, all that does is push people in corners–physically, mentally, financially, and emotionally–which actually increases the odds of those people reoffending. When people are ostracized, they generally don`t have the psychological tools for coping with that. Unless someone is extremely committed to self-awareness, self-control, introspection, and making sure they never do anything to jeopardize their freedom, it’s easy for them to become hopeless, which leads to a more nihilist attitude and bitterness, which leads to self-destructive behaviors. And those self-destructive behaviors invariably are destructive to the people and world around those self-destructive individuals.

Personally, if I was working with someone with a checkered past, I would want to keep them right there where I could keep an eye on them. I would know where they are, what they’re doing, and that they have something to lose if they slip up. From a rational standpoint, that increases my protection and safety. On the other end of the spectrum, if you push that person away and give them no vested interest in society, they become hopeless and antisocial. I mean, imagine if you were ostracized and shunned by society for years on end: at what point would you lash out, either at yourself of those around you?

As a society, what do we want? Who are we? Do we believe in compassion and forgiveness? Do we believe in second chances? Is prison enough punishment and protection? If we are going to let people out of prison, we need to recognize our responsibility to help these people reintegrate into society. A maxim I live by is that good behavior should be rewarded and bad behavior should not be rewarded. If you punish good behavior, what does that say? It tells the person you’re punishing that they shouldn`t do whatever it was that got him punished; It also tells him that punishment is arbitrary, and doing the right thing in society is meaningless: you’re a pariah no matter what you do.

Humans are simultaneously simple and complex. Performing a societal castration on someone–cutting them off, ostracizing them–is a simple response to a complex problem. Yes, there are serial predators and pure psychopaths in the world. But, more so, the world is populated by average human beings who make lots of mistakes and then try to learn from those mistakes and improve themselves.  The serial predators and psychopaths should be treated if possible, and kept locked away if they can’t be treated and taught to abide by society’s laws. As for the people who broke the trust of society…well, you don`t have to help them on their path to reintegration into society. But neither should you deliberately hinder them from trying to do good, to contribute to society, to pay taxes and make their amends. It’s debatable if people deserve third, fourth, and fifth chances, but everyone deserves a second chance.

Prison and Technology and Free Speech

When I first came to prison, about twenty years ago, they sold black and white tv’s, color CRT tv’s, Walkman’s, and cassette tapes. The internet was just beginning to take off, albeit at dial-up speeds. iPods didn`t even exist yet, much less smartphones and tablets. The adoption of technology in prisons is a slow process, usually years–if not decades–behind the free world. I’ve watched the in-prison transition from cassettes to cd’s to MP3 players, and CRT tv’s to flat screen tv’s. They started selling flat screens about four years ago, and started selling MP3 players (8GB, with the ability to receive emails and pictures) about three years ago. Still no typewriters, word processors, or computers: everything has to be written by hand. They did sell a little rubber keyboard, barely bigger than a smartphone, which plugs into the MP3 player under the guise of being able to send outgoing emails, but that never came to fruition. So you can type things on your MP3, but you can never get them off the MP3. Not that a miniature rubber keyboard is in any way an efficient means for typing.

The sales of these little tech trifles is for the purpose of making money. When the MP3’s were first rolled out, the whole system was run by Access Corrections, a subsidiary of Keefe Group, who in turn is owned by a private equity company in Chicago. They charged about $0.25 for sending a single message, $0.25 for sending a single picture, and $1.99 to download a single song. The prison phased out cd’s and cd players, so music costs $1.99 a song. At least it did until about a month or two ago. Though Access Corrections still runs the canteen ordering system here, the package program(wherein items are marked up by a minimum of double what they would cost on the streets), the system for sending inmates messages, and the music download system has been switched over to CorrLinks. Corrlinks is the inmate email system used in federal prisons, where inmates have tablets and can both receive and send emails. The Corrlinks system was rolled out here in Nevada last month, and I think they’re still working out the kinks. Music now costs $2.00 a song, messages cost $0.30 an email, and while there is a picture option on the inmate account in here, I don`t know if anyone can send pictures yet. Initially, emails took a week or two to arrive, but now they are delivered within a couple of hours.

As anyone who reads this blog knows, technology and business are a couple of my passions. I do my best to keep up on all the technological advances so that I don`t become irrevocably disconnected from the world. My limited access to technology combined with my conceptual abilities puts me in a unique position to see things from a completely different perspective and envision the path of technology. Technology is completely reshaping culture and society, and most likely causing an evolutionary shift via reshaping of human brains that are exposed to tablets, smartphones, and the internet from birth. Every cultural and societal shift comes with upheavals and often violent vicissitudes. We are in the midst of that societal shift. Which leads me to Wired’s most recent issue: “How we learned to stop worrying and love the future.” I`ll try to have Des create a hyperlink to the Wired site here so you can see the ingenious cover art that perfectly encapsulates  the current tech-driven anxiety in America. The title of the issue is a sly nod to Dr. Strangelove.

One of the articles was about Instagram–at CEO Kevin Systrom’s behest–employing artificial intelligence to automatically delete specific words and emoji from user’s feeds to eliminate toxicity from trolls. I don’t remember who originally said it, and I`m just paraphrasing here, but I really subscribe to this ethos: “I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend you–to the death–your right to say it.” Freedom of speech is the most fundamental and essential right in America, enshrined in our Constitution as the very first amendment. Any restriction on speech needs to be narrowly tailored because it’s very easy for a single restriction on speech to snowball into an overall restriction. What starts off as a benevolent plan to make the world a nicer place can turn to a more nefarious oppression of whole groups of people. It’s a slippery slope and the road to hell is paved with good intentions.

Immediately after the Instagram article was “Trolls Across America,” a map showing the percentage of comments that are hostile on the internet, broken down by states. Nevada came in as the third-highest percentage of hostile comments. The accompanying text says, “Internet Rule # 1: Never read the comments.” As you’ve no doubt noticed, my wife has the comments capability disabled on this blog, which is necessary because she doesn’t want to be inundated with vitriol any more than anyone else does. I believe, however, that everyone who wants to be heard should be heard. A couple lessons I’ve learned in life: 1. Pursuing anything out of hate for the purpose of harming another human being is a waste of time and energy because whatever you accomplish out of hate does nothing to improve one’s own lot in life. It destroys the pursuer as much as the pursued when that time and energy could have been spent on improving one’s self and the world around one’s self. 2. When encountering an uninformed viewpoint in the world, it’s an opportunity to educate rather than an excuse to spew vitriol.

The second lesson is why I think Google made a mistake when they fired an employee who wrote an email with outdated views. Google should have instead countered the employee’s misinformed assertions with a rational, science-based response, then invited that employee to a seminar wherein they could educate him about the flaws in his line of reasoning. It as a teachable moment, and Google let it pass by without teaching anyone anything. Racist and misogynistic beliefs should not be tolerated, but it shouldn`t be assumed that such beliefs can’t be challenged and minds can’t be changed.

That said, here is a link to Corrlinks. Anyone who has anything to say about this blog can comment to me directly. Set up a Corrlinks account to email Inmate Jeremy Strohmeyer, inmate # 0059389. I welcome comments and correspondence from anyone and everyone. Whether you are from Scotland, Vegas, or anywhere in between, I want to hear from you. I`ll answer any questions you have, and elaborate on any posts you want elaboration on. I`m a true believer in the power of dialogue to change hearts and minds for the better. I can’t email anyone back at this point, so you’ll have to include an address where I can send you snail mail if you want a direct response.

Alright, that’s all for now. The next few posts will be inventions and invention-related. Fifteen years ago I was really obsessed with the creation of the home network. I was a little ahead of the curve, as home networks are just now finally becoming a reality (albeit at a glacial pace). Speak freely and be kind to one another!

Busy, Busy, Busy

I might as well maximize my time, write a couple of posts at once, then have them posted a few days apart. I hadn’t posted in a few weeks because I was busy writing a cross-motion for summary judgement for a guy with an excessive force case. The state had filed a motion for summary judgement, and the guy had 21 days to respond. The guy who had been helping him before is in a different unit now, and it takes months to get an appointment for the law library (not that any of the law library workers could help anyway), so if I didn`t help him, he would most likely lose his case. Luckily, it’s not a complicated case, and the facts and law for the one count aren’t too numerous or complex. It took me a couple of weeks to read everything and familiarize myself with the case and write out the cross-motion. The guards at another prison used obvious excessive force on this guy, and he doesn’t know much about the law, so I felt compelled to help him. It’s definitely one of the things in life that can make you feel good: helping others.

Now my focus shifts to helping my friend, Mike, with his criminal appeal. He had a lawyer working on it for him, but it got denied at the first level (judicial district court) at the same time his lawyer was diagnosed with brain cancer. The criminal justice system doesn’t care, though: Mike has 33 days to file a notice of appeal, and it’s already been 23days. After I get that done, I need to prep for discovery for my civil case so I can prove a conspiracy between the defendants. That–the discovery process–will be a battle in and of itself, but I`ll do my best.

I’ve run out of time if I want to get this to the presses this week, so I`ll end here for now. Quickly, though, my stock picks for the week: Under Armour, Alphabet, and Amazon. Under Armour has been oversold by the market and the current price (around $16 a share for the class C shares) is a great entry point. The shares will probably hit $20-$30 a share in the next 12 months.

Alright, take care everyone, and be good to each other.

Lockdown Musings

Well, it’s another lockdown day. Starting last month, the prison has been instituting full-day lockdowns every week. We’ve been locked down all day on March 30th, and April 6th, 8th, 9th, 14th, and today–the 21st. Supposedly HDSP has been short-staffed on those days because guards are off somewhere training and/or being trained. However, information gathered on the inmate grapevine is not always 100% accurate. Heh.

Regardless, this sucks because I was supposed to have yard today, and since I`m already limited to only four hours of yard a week, I get only three hours this week. I get no yard on the weekends, and the cell I`m in gets no direct sunlight through the window, and I don`t get to leave my unit to go anywhere except for yard, gym, visits, law library, medical, or chapel…So, I will not breathe outside air, nor feel sunlight on my face, for almost four days straight. So much time indoors makes a person go a bit stir-crazy. It takes a lot of mental strength to deal with shit like this year in and year out without going crazy.

That’s not the point of today’s post, though. Today I’ve spent my time reading the April issue of the Atlantic. There was a great article (the cover-story, in fact) about sexism in Silicon Valley, which is reflective of sexism across the country. Silicon Valley’s response is $300 million from Intel devoted to “diversity efforts over the next five years,” Apple pledging $50 million to “partner with non-profits that work to improve the pipeline of women and minorities going into tech,” and Google increasing “its annual budget for promoting diversity from $115 million to $150 million.” Those commitments were made in 2015. So, $500 million spent…but on what, and to what avail? The rest of the article(here’s the link for whoever wants to read the original: “Why Is Silicon Valley So Awful To Women” by Liza Mundy) talks about seminars at corporations, apps to eliminate gender bias in t he hiring process, and unconscious-bias training as potential solutions to this problem. I think these are short-sighted solutions. This is a subject that’s personal to me because I saw my mom battle this shit when I was a kid and she was working at a tech company. She got paid less than she should have, and suffered all manner of discrimination both blatant and tacit, despite her intelligence and capabilities.

What’s the better solution, you ask? Well, first things first: put those hundreds of millions of dollars toward training and teaching today’s girls and young women to be tomorrow’s programmers, engineers, leaders, business executives, and scientists. If you create a pipeline of females to fill these positions, the numbers will shift. This problem of unconscious-bias toward women is deeply ingrained in our culture, society, and each of our psyches. Trying to change that with some training seminars aimed at adults won’t produce the substantive change that’s needed. It’s better to focus on finding camps and scholarships for girls and women with the stated goal of creating a higher percentage of female engineers, scientists, programmers, and business executives relative to the population numbers than males. I.E. if 13% of the male population in America are programmers, and 25% are business executives, then the “Women First” initiative would fund camps and scholarships with the stated goal of making 15% of the female population programmers, and 28% of the female population business executives. Or, if you want, make it a strictly numbers game, without worrying about percentages. If there are 200,000 male programmers in America, the stated goal will be creating 210,000 female programmers in America. Set aggressive goals to surpass men, not just create parity.

A second solution is for women to vote with their wallets. No, not just in stores, but in investments. If a fund of company does not have parity for women in pay and management positions, sell that investment and invest in companies that have those things. Or be an activist investor wherein you pool your resources with other women in order to buy enough shares in companies to put forth shareholder resolutions such as a stated corporate mandate that women will be paid the same as men, and women will account for half of management positions. This solution would be pursued in conjunction with the camp and scholarship solution.

For my part, I need someone technical on my team for the invention I`m working on. So if there are any women out there who are programmers or engineers familiar with robotics and electronics, and are passionate about those things, and you would want to work on a start-up, please contact me or my wife. I don`t have the technical skills or training to perfect my invention: my skill set is the conceptual and create thinking, and the business forecasting necessary for envisioning the product and its potential profitability in the future.  I`ll have my current partner send you an NDA and all our invention notes and specs so far.

Alright, that’s all for today. Those are my lockdown musings for the moment.

DISGUSTING

We’re all desolation angels striving to survive in a chaotic world. Sparrows caught in downdrafts, furiously beating our wings to stay aloft, sometimes plummeting senselessly to the unforgiving ground below, sometimes soaring above it all, soaring to new heights heretofore unimagined.

That was something I wrote recently–just popped into my head. I think it’s a pretty fair assessment. You’re probably wondering about the title, and the fact that it has nothing to do with the passage above. Well, the title comes from a prosaic piece of hate mail I received shortly after the LVRJ article about my case ran. Hopefully I can get it scanned and posted here. It’s an anonymous card from someone saying they are so sorry to have read that I am still alive and married, followed by “DISGUSTING.” The emphasis on “disgusting” actually made me laugh. It used to be something like this would hurt my feelings because I’d so desperately want everyone–even weirdos like the one who sent this postcard to me–to know that I was not the monster the media made me out to be. It took me a long time to realize that people are going to believe what they want to believe, regardless of what the actual truth is. So, to my dear weirdo: I`m so very sorry to disappoint you, but thank you for caring so much. I subscribe to the golden rule, so I wish you all the best and hope you find some comfort in your random missives to strangers. If you need a friend, feel free to send me your address next time and I’d be happy to correspond with you.

My dear weirdo ended his/her missive with this line: “There is no telling how many other female children would have met the same fate had it not been for Det Ramos.” Oddly enough, this line made me wonder if this was in fact Ramos sending me this card. It wouldn`t susprise me. A lot of times I`m struck by the utter surreality of not only my own life but life in general. Life is full of strange juxtapositions, and I am one of those juxtapositions. People like this dear weirdo think I am some soulless monster, but the truth is that I am an extremely empathetic person always looking to make the world a better place. This person’s statement makes me ask them: how many other female children have met the same fate because of Detective Ramos? Maybe they should ask Ramos. He knows the part he played in making sure Dave Cash went free twenty years ago.

I recently read an article about “The Leftovers” in The Atlantic, and a line caught my eye: Incomprehensible violence and the tragedy that follows, the implication goes, inject a surreal dimension into existence. That is so true. We as humans, when faced with that surrealness, seek to smooth down that bubble threatening to break the surface of our reality, seek to rationalize and simplify the often inexplicable. Even when an explanation is to be had, if it’s too complex–or has too many conflicting contracts and juxtapositions that can’t be boiled down to one line–people generally gravitate toward the more simple explanation regardless of how true it is. Such is my surreality.

Anyway, a friend recently asked a really good question after reading one of my last couple of posts: why do I believe I was ever in that bathroom stall at all? The fact of the matter is that I don`t know if I was ever in there at all, but I can’t claim that because I have no memory of being there or not being there. Looking back, it’s really messed up how I was manipulated by the detectives and then Leslie Abramson and the people surrounding me at the time. At this point, though, it’s all moot. All I can hope is that Dave Cash has led a legally upright life and become a better person so as not to inflict any harm on anyone else in this world, that Sherrice’s family has found peace, and that I might be given at least the opportunity for a second chance outside of prison walls and concerting wire. Hope springs eternal. No matter what, I`ll always strive to do good and be a better man today than I was yesterday. After I conclude my lawsuit against the state and its more corrupt prison employees up North, I`ll start getting all my discovery sent in and share all the actual physical evidence from my case(or lack thereof) here. The cost of all that copying and postage is too prohibitive at this point.

I did want to clarify one thing from my last couple of posts: I am not anti-government or anti-police. It occurred to me that my decrying the pro-government and pro-police stance and bias of the LVRJ in its reporting might be misconstrued as anti-government and anti-police stance on my part. I am in fact all for government and police that operate as intended, as protectors of the people instead of their oppressors. I am staunchly anti-corruption when it comes to all  government agents and anyone in positions of power. There are many public servants who strive to do good, to uphold the oaths they have sworn, and those people should be commended and celebrated(whether they be police, attorneys, administrators, prison guards, or any other public servant). However, institutions and individuals in positions of power should not be blindly venerated and deified, especially not by the last bastion of protection against those institutions and individuals when they become corrupt–the media.

Believe it or not, that concludes this post. I know, right? It’s almost unbelievably short for my rambling ass. The next few posts may seem a bit disjointed because they were actually written a couple of months ago, but didn`t get posted because of all the stuff going on the past couple months. I`ll have my wifey post them in rapid succession so we can get up to date, then I`ll follow with new posts starting again in the next couple of weeks. I hope everyone out there is having a safe and happy Summer. Yeah, you too, weirdo. Or should I say, “Have a DISGUSTING Summer.” ? Heh. For real, though, all humor aside: be good to eachother.

HateMail

Las Vegas Review-Journal reporter Rachel Crosby callously says of 7-year old murder victim Sherrice Iverson, “She just would have ended up in prison anyway.”

Note: Crosby’s verbatim statement and all her correspondence to me and my wife leading up to her articles about my case can be found below, so everyone can see the “journalistic process” and the many faces journalists from the LVRJ have.

“First things first I’ma say all the words inside my head I’m fired up and tired of the way that things have been, oh ooh The way that things have been, oh ooh Second thing  Second, don’t you tell me what you think that I can be I’m the one at the sail, I’m the master of my sea I was broken from a young age Taking my soul into the masses Write down my poems for the few That looked at me took to me, shook to me, feeling me Singing from heart ache from the pain Take up my message from the veins Speaking my lesson from the brain Seeing the beauty through the pain Third things third Send a prayer to the ones up above All the hate that you’ve heard has turned your spirit to a dove. Your spirit up above” -“Believer” by Imagine Dragons

“Show me how to lie You’re getting better all the time And turning all against the one
Is an art that’s hard to teach Another clever word Sets off an unsuspecting herd And as you get back into line A mob jumps to their feet Now dance, fucker, dance Man, he never had a chance And no one even knew It was really only you And now you steal away Take him out today Nice work you did You’re gonna go far, kid With a thousand lies And a good day’s write Hit ’em right between the eyes When you walk away Nothing more to say See the lightning in your eyes See ’em running for their lives Slowly out of line And drifting closer in your sights So play it out I’m wide awake It’s a scene about me There’s something in your way And now someone is gonna pay And if you can’t get what you want Well it’s all because of me And now you’ll lead the way Show the light of day Nice work you did You’re gonna go far, kid, trust, deceived!And no one even knew It was really only you”-You’re Gonna Go Far, Kid” By The Offspring

“Take away your things and go You can’t take back what you said, I know I’ve heard it all before, at least a million times I’m not one to forget, you know I don’t believe, I don’t believe it You left in peace, left me in pieces Too hard to breathe I’m on my knees right now I’m so sick of that same old love, that shit, it tears me up I’m so sick of that same old love, my body’s had enough I’m so sick of that same old love, feels like I’ve blown apart
I’m so sick of that same old love, the kind that breaks your heart”-“Same Old Love” by Selena Gomez

I distrust summaries, any kind of gliding through time, any too great a claim that one is in control of what one recounts; I think someone who claims to understand but who is obviously calm, someone who claims to write with emotion recollected in tranquility, is a fool and a liar. To understand is to tremble. To recollect is to re-enter and be riven. An acrobat after spinning through the air in a mockery of flight stands erect on his perch and mockingly takes his bow as if what he is being applauded for was easy for him and cost him nothing, although meanwhile he is covered with sweat and his smile is edged with a relief chilling to think about; he is indulging in a show-business style; he is pretending to be superhuman. I am bored with that and with here it has brought us. I admire the authority of being on one’s knees in front of the event.”-Harold Brodkey. Quoted in Jon Krakauer’s “Into Thin Air”

               The past couple months have been difficult, to say the least. These two months have been like a truncated microcosm of the past two decades. The song and book quotes above are a synopsis of my thoughts and feelings the past two months. First, a quick explanation of everything above. The “headline” for this entry is a satirical spotlight on the total lack of journalistic integrity inherent in the Las Vegas Review-Journal “reporting”. It’s the same kind of incendiary click-bait the LVRJ uses on a regular basis, and used on Twitter, Facebook, and their website in writing about my case in an attempt to manipulate Twitter trends through inorganic activity. Worse than outright fake news is the manipulation and misrepresentation of facts and information to deceive the public and manipulate their emotions for the purpose of protecting corrupt and malfeasant public officials. If I were to give this blog post a real headline, it would be “Disinformation campaigns. Inside the Las Vegas Review- Journal’s War on Jeremy Strohmeyer.” Manipulating information the way the LVRJ does is akin to a petty parlor trick by a second-rate magician in a person’s home to distract from the magicians cohorts robbing everyone blind. “Hey, watch my left hand while my right hand deftly picks your pocket.” A petty but effective ruse.

The click-bait “headline” above is also for the purpose of illustrating and highlighting the discrepancy between Crosby’s public writing and her more private musings. While feigning sympathy for Sherrice in her articles, Crosby expresses what seems like disdain for Sherrice in her letter to me. This isn`t exclusive to Crosby, but rather reflects a reality inherent in media in general–a general fakeness in dealing with individuals and the public at large when pursuing stories. I leave it to whoever reads this to reconcile the discrepancies between the perception and the reality.

Now the song quotes and the quote from “Into Thin Air.” I am fired up and tired of the way that things have been, but at the same time, all the hate I’ve heard has turned my spirit to a dove. Whenever I think or talk about my case, about Sherrice, I always send a prayer to the ones up above. I approach on my knees, head bowed, and full of reverence. Such a tragedy deserves nothing less. Sherrice deserves nothing less. I have lived this, paid for this, for the past twenty years, and my knees are battered, bloodied, my heart reverent and penitent. So when this tragedy is trivialized and sensationalized by people who weren’t there twenty years ago; people who won’t deign to actually search for or report the facts, the truth; people who seek personal enrichment and gain off of other’s pain and suffering; my heart hurts and an anger stirs inside of me.

“You’re Gonna Go Far Kid”, is for Crosby and Dave Cash. When Crosby first approached my wife about her planned article, it was my hope that she would approach this with a journalistic integrity, a commitment to truth, and not a carnival barker’s penchant for sensationalization. I hoped for fresh eyes seeing and speaking the truth instead of spouting off the same inflammatory rhetoric and repeating the same half-truths and lies of twenty years ago to maintain the original fake narrative thread created by Ramos and the Long Beach police and so deftly woven into a tapestry by the D.A. and Las Vegas media. Well, as the old adage goes: hope in one hand and shit in the other and see which one fills up first.

I was recently reintroduced to Shakespeare’s superior word play, his penchant for puns and ironies through choice of words. The figurative and literal blurred, sometimes existing separately, sometimes existing simultaneously, sometimes both at the same time like some bizarre effect of quantum physics shown in words. That’s the spirit of the “Same Old Love” quote. Crosby’s repetition of the same old public ridicule and disparagement against me is “the same old love.” Obviously the hate and vilifying is the opposite of love, but the attention they shower on me is the same amount of attention poured on someone by another who loves them, and the LVRJ loves sensationalizing and promoting this tragedy. Such is the irony of “the same old love.” Crosby and her cohorts don’t care about the effects of their words beyond what they can profit from them. They probably hope, like Ramos, that they can incite violence against me, get me murdered here in prison, by publishing and promoting the most inflammatory and prejudicial things possible to inflame the passions of the public against me. Or they just don`t care. They leave in peace and leave me in pieces. I`m so sick of that same old love, and it breaks my heart. It tears me up.

Every day I quietly strive to do good, be good, lead a good life. I strive to accomplish things for the good of all, hoping for a sense of making a difference. I had committed to a couple of different guys in here to help them with challenges in their lives before the LVRJ articles about my case were published, and local news stations picked them up and ran with the story. Everyone knows that the most despised and reviled cases are those that involve the sexual assaults and murders of children, especially in prison. So it’s no surprise that the sensationalized publicizing of my case pretty immediately led to everyone in here talking about me and my case. Not the actual truth and facts of it, mind you, but rather the screaming headlines of the most sordid details.

I was already anxious and depressed before the LVRJ articles came out, dreading the fallout, anticipating the need for hypervigilance to keep from getting murdered, from someone assaulting or attempting to murder me again, after Crosby approached my wife. When the whispers started again, I girded myself for the worst. Instead, I had heartfelt conversations with both friends and acquaintances about media manipulation, corrupt police tactics, pain, contrition, and forgiveness. Anyone who gets to know me knows I`m not a child molester, not some psycho killer, not some heartless asshole intent on raining down pain and misery on the world. Anyone who doesn’t know me and forms their opinion based solely on the LVRJ coverage would think me a monster.

The first to approach me were my friends, guys who already knew what I was in prison for. They let me know that they were talking about my case on tv, and everyone in here was talking about it. The second to approach me was a black kid (24 years old–which is still a kid to me) I had been helping out with advice and the proverbial shoulder to cry on. He has two young daughters, one being treated for cancer, so the way they presented my case on the news hit him hard. However, he had already gotten to know me over the past few months, and the reality of who I am didn`t jibe with the media presentation. So instead of immediately inflicting a physical assault on me the way the media presentation made him want to, he asked me about it and told me how upset he was by it.

I got to tell him the things the media left out, the actual truth of the matter. I was on my way to Vegas with my best friend, David Cash, when I was eighteen. A selfish, self-destructive little punk, I did meth, took pills, and drank until blacking out that night. I had no memory of what happened, but when I woke up in Vegas the next morning, a little girl was dead. She was violently sexually assaulted and murdered. Dave knew I had blacked out and that he was the only living person who knew what happened in that bathroom stall. When we got back to Long Beach, Dave went to the cops and cut a deal to testify against me. There was no evidence at the crime scene, in the bathroom stall–at least no evidence against me. There were fingerprints, but they didn`t match me. There was no physical evidence: No DNA, no fibers, no skin, no hair, no footprints, nothing. A violent sexual assault and murder in a small enclosed space and there’s no physical evidence? That defies credulity. If you talked to me and talked to Dave Cash twenty years ago, and someone asked you which of us would be more likely to commit this crime, you would invariably say Dave. However, our justice system rewards snitches who are willing to testify against co-defendants regardless of who is guilty of what. Truth takes a backseat to getting someone, anyone, convicted of the crime. Despite being at the crime scene, and having the same amount of physical evidence against him as against me, Dave was never charged with any crime.

The actual evidence they had was surveillance camera footage showing both Dave and me following Sherrice into a corner where there were entrances to a men’s bathroom and a women’s bathroom where in Sherrice’s body was later found in a bathroom stall. The media invariably stated that the camera footage showed me following Sherrice into the bathroom when it in fact did not; and the media tended to leave out the part about Dave following Sherrice under the camera. The only other evidence was a cigarette butt that crime scene photographs show was planted by the police in an ashtray at the entrance to the women’s bathroom. That cigarette butt supposedly had my DNA on it, but the DNA was tested by the police lab and was supposedly completely destroyed in the testing process, making it impossible to confirm or disprove the police lab finding that it was my DNA.

Like most middle-class white Americans, I was always taught that the police are our friends, they resolutely uphold their duty to pursue the truth and uphold the law in protection of all of us, and that I should always trust them. So the thought of police detectives destroying evidence, lying, intentionally eliciting false confessions, and trying to mold evidence and perceptions to convict whomever they’ve chosen to convict regardless of the truth seemed impossible to me when I was eighteen, and probably still seems impossible to some people. For those people with that unwavering faith in the police and other government and public institutions, I don`t blame you. I mean, who would want to think that the institutions meant to protect us are actually filled with people who have no qualms about violating the very laws they’re meant to uphold in order to protect us? That’s scary. However, I hope you blindly faithful never end up on the wrong side of those people or institutions because they will use that faith to destroy you.

So, not knowing whether or not I had committed these crimes, I assumed that I was at least guilty in part and tried to kill myself. A bottle of pills, a bottle of Jack, and some beer. The Long Beach police arrested me shortly thereafter, and drove me to the hospital when my mom told them I’d taken the pills. While I was still semi-coherent in the car, I asked for a lawyer, and the Long Beach detectives told me I didn`t want a lawyer before beginning their interrogation on the way to the hospital. They never read me my Miranda rights.

Unless you’ve studied interrogation techniques of the time, or have been subjected to a full-blown interrogation by seasoned detectives, you have no idea how they actually work. They don`t ask questions so much as they tell you what they want you to say and lead you to giving the answers they want by giving you information and getting you to repeat it. Initially, I said nothing, just cried like the 18-year-old boy I was. When I refused to talk to the doctors and nurses at the hospital, they threatened me in order to get me to respond and comply with their requests, telling me to piss in a cup or they would shove a tube up my dick. As the drugs entered my system, they took my blood and urine, and I started wavering on the edge of consciousness as they stuck a tube up my nose and down my throat to pump my stomach. The whole time the detectives kept interrogating me. I was high, drunk, confused, and terrified. They were methodical and relentless, giving me the information from the crime scene they had at the time. When I finally started talking, I told them the truth: I had blacked out and had no memory of what happened. That led to a long list of hypotheticals: “Well, is it possible you did this and that even if you can’t remember it?” Of course, anything is possible, and your admission to those possibilities is the first step toward eliciting a false confession.

After the hospital, it was off to the Long Beach police station to continue the interrogation in a room with a hidden microphone and tape recorder. A few more hours, and I was ready to tell them whatever they wanted to hear so I could go to sleep. They drilled me and made sure I was repeating everything they said perfectly before they brought in Las Vegas detective Ramos in with his own tape recorder. I sat across the table from Ramos in a small room with the Long Beach detective sitting right behind Ramos, nodding at me to answer yes at certain points, and shaking his head when I should answer no. I recited what the Long Beach detectives had told me to say. All told, I think it took about five hours from the time they arrested me until they got that false confession out of me.

Afterward, the Long Beach detectives said they had read me my Miranda rights and said I had just started confessing straightaway, and that I spent all those hours just confessing non-stop, that I was completely sober and coherent during this supposed marathon confession. It came down to my word against theirs. Wait, you say, what about the urine and blood from the hospital? Well, that was destroyed by the police, and they said they “lost” it. Hold on, you say, the hidden tape recording of the Long Beach interrogation will prove the truth of the matter one way or another! Nope, sorry, foiled again by the police: the tape was destroyed by the detectives, and they said it was “water damage.”

After about a year-and-a-half of constant media attention on my case, with the media(particularly the LVRJ)repeating the police and D.A. narrative and sensationalizing the case as much as possible, getting an impartial jury in Vegas would have been impossible. My parents had spent all their savings, mortgaged and sold everything they owned to pay for the supposed best lawyer, Leslie Abramson. However, once they ran out of money, Leslie tricked me into taking an involuntary and unknowing plea bargain for life without.

I explained all this to the kid, then explained how it doesn’t matter what I did or didn`t do that night, it doesn’t matter what Dave did or didn`t do: at the end of the day, I chose to have a scumbag best friend, chose to drink and do drugs until blacking out, and a little girl died as a result. If I had been in my right mind and not blacked out that night, nothing would have happened to Sherrice. Not only because I would not have done anything to harm her, but also because I would not have let anyone else do anything to her. But because I was blacked out, the horrible tragedy happened, and I had to pay for that. And I have paid for it for the past twenty years, paying my penance.

When Crosby approached my wife, it was shortly after I had seen a documentary about kids with life without in Massachusetts getting parole hearings after life without for juveniles was deemed cruel and unusual punishment by the U.S. Supreme Court. The common thread in what the victims’ families said was that it was extremely painful for them to revisit the loss of their loved ones. So my concern with the LVRJ’s quest to publicize everything again was the effect it would have on Sherrice’s family. Crosby and the LVRJ had-and have-no interest in seeking the truth that is more complex than the original simplified narrative, nor did they seek to change the outcome: they just wanted to rehash the gruesome details with no concern for how it might affect Sherrice’s family. I, however, want peace for Sherrice’s family.

In discussing this, the kid said that if it was him, he would send flowers to Sherrice’s mom every year, on the anniversary of Sherrice’s death. I told him I thought that was a bit macabre and stalkerish, but that when I wrote Crosby, I asked about reaching out to Sherrice’s family to ask their forgiveness and to tell them the man I am today is not the boy I was twenty years ago. The kid grew up in the inner city, lived the gang life, and saw his share of violence and senseless tragedy. Based on his experiences, the losses he’s seen, he thought I should do my best to reach out to Sherrice’s mom. He said he would actually reach out to her online on my behalf so he could tell her what he saw in me himself, if I was telling the truth and could show him paperwork that confirms what I said about there being zero physical evidence against me in the bathroom stall. Now I have to get my wife to go through the tens of thousands of pages of discovery to find that because I do want the chance to reach out and apologize, and ask for forgiveness.

The kid is way more street-smart than I ever was at his age, so he understood the detectives eliciting a false confession, and he had been through similar interrogations himself. We talked about police corruption, destruction and withholding of evidence. After talking with the kid, I helped him write a letter to his baby mama to put his feelings for her and their baby into words because he had asked me to. It wasn’t much, but it was my way of helping him and doing something positive for him. I`m a true believer that the small things make a difference.

After the kid talked to me, another couple guys talked to me. One had a murder case where he killed a woman and paralyzed a man during a shoot-out in a casino parking lot. He got eight to twenty years. Another has a second-degree murder conviction and a life with parole after ten years. Their experiences with the media and criminal justice system were similar to mine, except they were more savvy than I was when it came to the criminal justice system, so they weren’t so easily manipulated by detectives and lawyers. A few days later, a guard I’d previously conversed with about economics and criminal justice mentioned to me that he had seen the LVRJ stuff online, and that he thought I should be given a chance at parole since I was a teenager at the time and I had been in prison twenty years already. I really appreciated that. Around the same time, another inmate I did not know tried to talk shit to me in front of guards and other inmates because of what he had seen on the news.

When it comes to situations like that, I won’t get into a public shouting match or confrontation, so I ignored the guy. The next day I caught him by himself and let him know that he didn`t know me, and that the media representation is neither the whole story nor who I am as a person. Again, he got loud as he walked away from me, so I figured he would want to come at me physically when he had the chance. My rule has always been that I will avoid physical violence if at all possible, and will take physical action only if someone lays hands on me first, and even then only if the man attacking me actually has the power to physically harm me. I`ll defend myself, but I`ll always do my best to defuse the situation beforehand so it doesn’t come to that. When the kid had approached me a few days earlier, he let me know the news story had made him want to beat the shit out of me, and I let him know I didn`t blame him because the media representation is so horrible and so far from the truth, and it’s a horrible crime. So I would take my lumps if it came to that.

Ironically, after the kid heard about my confrontation with the other inmate–whom he knew–he went to him (without telling me), and told him the actual facts as I had described them to him. After that, the other inmate actually came up to me and apologized. He didn`t know me but he knew the kid and trusted his word and judgement. That’s usually the way of it: anyone who actually knows me knows that the media representation of me is the exact opposite of who I actually am. It’s the people/inmates who don’t know me that I have to worry about. So now I have to keep my head on a swivel and be prepared for a blindside attempt on my life at any moment while keeping from letting that hypervigilance turn into full-blown paranoia. It’s a balance, a fine line to be walked, in order to keep from getting got.

Despite the anxiety and depression, I had to help another guy fill out a pardons board application. He was one of the four people involved in a robbery and first-degree murder when he was twenty-eight. One of the four murderers went to the police and cut a deal, and never got charged with any crimes. The other three didn`t and got convicted. The guy I`m helping got a plea-bargain for life with parole after twenty years, but having already served over ten years and having dropped out of the gang he was in and having changed his life, he wanted a chance at parole sooner. I helped as best I could, because anyone with a contrite spirit who wants to do good should get a second chance.

So, that’s the personal experiences for me this past month or so. This post is too long as is, so I`m going to wrap this up here. Here is the correspondence, in chronological order, between Rachel Crosby, my wife, and myself. I`ll address the LVRJ articles, the purpose of journalism, and journalistic integrity in my next post. Thank you for taking the time to read all this, to hear my side of things.

Crosby and my wife initially exchanged two voicemails before the following e-mail corresponded was exchanged:

April 19th, 2017 from Desiree Strohmeyer to Rachel Crosby

Hi Rachel,

I apologize for not getting back to you sooner. I’ve been pretty busy and went out of town. I haven’t had a real chance to talk to Jeremy about this yet, but I will hopefully this weekend. Would you mind telling me what your interest in the case is? It has been quite a while.

Thanks,

Desiree

April 19th, 2017 from Rachel Crosby to Desiree Strohmeyer

Hi Desiree, it’s good to hear from you. I wanted to give you time and space to talk with Jeremy about it and hoped to touch base with you next week, so your email is actually great timing.

As for my interest, I’m working on a story about the case as it will be 20 years in May. I will be upfront with you — I am looking at the case from all angles, including the victim’s side (though I haven’t been able to make contact with the victim’s family yet).

That being said, 20 years is a long time. You do not have to talk about the case itself, unless you or Jeremy wants to. I was just hoping to have an honest conversation about where you both are in life now. And after reading some of your blog posts (and Jeremy’s) I am interested in how you and Jeremy are able to maintain such a seemingly healthy relationship given the situation you are in. (By the way, you both are great writers).

I again just want to emphasize I am coming into this story as a blank slate. I have no preconceived notions about Jeremy or you or what the story will say. What I write and print will depend entirely on how much you both want — or don’t want — to share.

I was hoping to chat next week or, at the latest, if possible, the week after next. I am flexible, and since I can’t visit Jeremy (the prison will not allow media interviews on property, which is another story), I want you both to know I’d feel comfortable talking on the phone with him in your presence (if that’s what you both would like).

I realize this is a lot so feel free to touch base with me next week. You can reach me here or at 702-***-****.

Best,

Rachel

April 22nd, 2017 from Desiree Strohmeyer to Rachel Crosby

Hi Rachel,

I hope your weekend is going well. I did have the chance to speak with Jeremy today about you contacting me and your e-mail about what your interest in the case is. He would like you to send him your CV, some samples of your work, and give him more of an idea of what you’re wanting to know for your piece. He can be reached at:

Jeremy Strohmeyer

#59389

HDSP

P.O. Box 650

Indian Springs, NV 89070

Mail gets to him from Las Vegas pretty quickly, so if you could send that info over, that would be great. It is a max of 20 printed pages per envelope, FYI.

As for my involvement, I`m not sure how much more information I can provide to you for your story other than what is written in my blog. I`m certainly not opposed to some questions for review and that I can review with Jeremy.

Take care,

Desiree

April 24th, 2017 from Rachel Crosby to Desiree Strohmeyer

Hi Desiree,

I’ve talked with my editor and we agreed that should be fine. I will get a few clips together this afternoon & I will mail the packet either today or tomorrow, so he should get it soon.

What is the best way to get hold of him, if he agrees to chat? I want to know if I should include any specific contact info in the packet.

Thank you,

Rachel

April 24th, 2017 from Desiree Strohmeyer to Rachel Crosby

Okay, awesome. I`ll let him know that some info is on the way to him. He can be reached via mail initially and if you would like to speak with him on the phone, and he agrees, I can certainly facilitate that with letting you know the times he is out for tier and what would work best. His schedule is a bit all over the place and lately there have been a lot of lock-downs, so it does get a bit precarious trying to speak with him on the phone at a scheduled time because he can only call out and not receive calls, as you know.  I have your desk phone number and if you’d like to provide a mobile, it is a number I can also keep on hand for Jeremy. If not, I`m open to meeting up and taking a call from Jeremy for you to talk to him, if that is better for you. Like I said, it is difficult to pin a date/time down, though, because of his schedule.I did want to mention that you can also expect to be getting a comment from Jeremy’s lawyer as well. Let me know if you have any other questions.

Desiree

May 2nd, 2017 from Rachel Crosby to Desiree Strohmeyer

Hey, I just wanted to let you know I sent in that packet Jeremy requested. You can forward his lawyer’s comment to me, or tell his lawyer to get in touch with me directly — whichever you prefer.

Please let me know what Jeremy decides. If he does want to chat on the phone, I’d prefer to set it up with you if possible. If he decides to write, please let me know so I can keep an eye out for it. And if he does not wish to participate, I completely understand that too. But I wanted to reach out and give him the opportunity.

I hope you are well. Thanks so much.

Rachel

May 2nd, 2017 from Desiree Strohmeyer to Rachel Crosby

I’ll let him know it’s sent. He mentioned he hadn’t received anything as of yesterday, but I’ll have him look out for it. Can you let me know when it was posted? Just want to make sure the prison isn’t withholding. Thanks!

May 2nd, 2017 from Rachel Crosby to Desiree Strohmeyer

I sent it in Thursday I believe. So it may have been posted either Thursday or Friday. I meant to send it sooner but it was a busy week of breaking news. Hopefully they are not withholding it….thank you!

Rachel

May 4th, 2017 from Desiree Strohmeyer to Rachel Crosby

Hey Rachel,

Got a chance to talk to Jeremy this evening for a few minutes. Like I mentioned before, the prison has had a lot of lockdowns lately, so communication has been sparse.  He did have a few questions.

Why do you think this story is worth revisiting? Was this your idea or your editors? What are you trying to accomplish here? You mentioned not having the material to accomplish what you have in mind for the story. Also, what are your thoughts on the hurt this rehashing may have on the victim’s family?

Hopefully I’ll talk to him again tomorrow. That’s all for now. Thanks.

May 5th, 2017 from Rachel Crosby to Desiree Strohmeyer

I do have enough material to accomplish what I had in mind, which is a 20-years-later reflection on a case that affected both the Las Vegas Valley (emotionally) and the casino industry. It is common to do major anniversary stories; I just completed one (at the end of April) on the 25th anniversary of the Historic Westside riots.

I am of course concerned about the victim’s family, but I have since been in touch with them and believe I can tell the story in a sensitive, rather than sensationalized, way. I was hoping some of the clips I sent Jeremy, as requested, showed that.

I do not need Jeremy’s interview or input for the story. But I reached out beginning several weeks ago in an attempt to give him every opportunity to include himself if he saw fit. He does not have to talk about the case, but since the story does involve him, I was respectfully letting him know it was happening and asking if he’d like to participate.

The story is slated to run May 21, so if he would like to talk, it would need to be next week or early in the following week (unless he would rather send a letter). Please let me know if he’d like to know anything else.

I hope you are well, Desiree. I know you never signed up for being the messenger, but thank you very much for all the help.

Best,

Rachel

May 6th, 2017 from Desiree Strohmeyer to Rachel Crosby

Had a chance to speak with Jeremy and go over your most recent email. You’ll be receiving a letter from him this week. We both felt a letter would be best because of the precarious phone situation and in the interest of not wasting anyone’s time. Let me know if you have anything additional that you’d like me to relay to him.

Desiree

May 6th, 2017 from Rachel Crosby to Desiree Strohmeyer

Thank you again. I’ll be on the lookout for it, and I’ll let you know when I receive it. I wish the phone situation wasn’t so frustrating – for this, and for you both.

When he does send, please have him make sure the address says “Rachel Crosby – EDITORIAL, Las Vegas Review-Journal.”

The editorial part is most important because our mailroom isn’t in the same building as the newsroom. Just in case, the return address is 1111 W. Bonanza Rd.

Please let me know if you or Jeremy have any questions or want to touch base. You can reach me here.

Best,

Rachel

May 12th, 2017 from Desiree Strohmeyer to Rachel Crosby

Just letting you know that you should be receiving the letter tomorrow. There was a delay with getting someone to sign off on the send out of the envelope at the prison, but it is on its way.

May 12th, 2017 from Rachel Crosby to Desiree Strohmeyer

Thank you. I’ve been on the lookout for it, but hadn’t received it yet. Was going to check in with you today. I’m sure it’ll be here by Monday.

Best,

Rachel

May 15th, 2017 from Rachel Crosby to Desiree Strohmeyer

Hey there Desiree,

I haven’t received the letter yet. Just wanted to make sure everything was OK on the prison’s end. Hopefully there’s no issues….maybe the mail is just taking awhile.

Rachel

May 15th, 2017 from Desiree Strohmeyer to Rachel Crosby

You should have received today. He sent me a letter at the same time and I got it this morning. Did your mail already run today? I can’t imagine they would hold up your letter and allow mine through as they were mailed on the same day.

May 15th, 2017 from Rachel Crosby to Desiree Strohmeyer

They passed out all the mail into our mailboxes this morning. So maybe it was delivered, but it hasn’t been disseminated yet. I called the mail room earlier but the manager was on lunch…..I’ll call again soon.

Thank you! That makes me feel better. Glad there weren’t any issues.

May 15th, 2017 from Desiree Strohmeyer to Rachel Crosby

Let me know if you don`t get it. Hopefully it is on its way to your desk.

May 16th, 2017 from Rachel Crosby to Desiree Strohmeyer

Still haven’t received it…not in the mail room. Just letting you know. Not sure what the hold up is.

May 16th, 2017 from Desiree Strohmeyer to Rachel Crosby

Very odd. I’m not sure. I do have a copy of it and I can type it out if that would work for you. Not the best case scenario but an option.

May 16th, 2017 from Rachel Crosby to Desiree Strohmeyer

Would you mind sending a photo of it? So you don’t have to type it out.

It may come tomorrow, but that would be very helpful.

May 16th, 2017 from Desiree Strohmeyer to Rachel Crosby

Let me know if you can read this once it’s been blown up <attached scan of Jeremy’s letter to Rachel>

May 16th, 2017 from Rachel Crosby to Desiree Strohmeyer

It’s a little difficult to read, but I think I can make it out. If I don’t get the letter tomorrow, I may ask that you type it…or that we briefly meet in person, whichever is easier.

Thank you for being so helpful Desiree.

Rachel

May 16th, 2017 from Desiree Strohmeyer to Rachel Crosby

See attached. <Typed out letter from Jeremy to Rachel>

May 16th, 2017 from Rachel Crosby to Desiree Strohmeyer

Oh jeez. I’m sorry. Thank you for taking the time to do that. I’ll be sure to write him back when things slow down over here.

Best,

Rachel

May 16th, 2017 from Desiree Strohmeyer to Rachel Crosby

hopefully that helps!

May 16th, 2017 from Rachel Crosby to Desiree Strohmeyer

It does, very much so. Thanks again.

May 17th, 2017 from Rachel Crosby to Desiree Strohmeyer

I got it in the mail today. Thank you again. Also, quick question…were you two married in 2010? or 2009? I want to make sure I’m doing the math correctly.

May 17th, 2017 from Desiree Strohmeyer to Rachel Crosby

We married in 2009.

Glad the letter got there. I will let Jeremy know. We were concerned the prison had blocked it.

May 17th, 2017 from Rachel Crosby to Desiree Strohmeyer

Me too. I liked his letter, by the way. Would like to write him back some day soon.

That being said, I want you both to know the story goes over the case in detail. I can’t write the story without going over the details of the case.

I included the most relevant pieces of what Jeremy sent me. So his current voice is absolutely in there. But his voice is not the only one included.

I talked to some people who did not believe Jeremy’s most recent words…at all. I am kindly letting you both know so you are both prepared for that. I hope you and him understand.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Rachel

That concludes the e-mail correspondence between Crosby and my wife. See below images for Crosby’s letter to me, followed by my typed out letter to her, in response.

RachelCrosbyLVRJLetterPart1

RachelCrosbyLVRJLetterPart2

5/8/2017

Hi Rachel,

I hope this letter finds you in the best of health and spirits. Thank you for writing me and sending some of your clips. I`m not sure we will have time to carry on a full conversation about the things you want to talk about, given your rapidly approaching deadline and our not being able to talk on the phone due to fees. However, I will carry on this conversation with you as long as you’d like. You can’t get to know someone in just one letter or one clip. Thank you, too, for taking the time to give me a bit of your history. It sounds like you are quite accomplished for having graduated so recently. Your writing reflects your obvious talent, and thus the reason for your rapid professional ascent.

I`m sorry to hear that the impetus for your move back to Vegas was your father’s death in 2015. I am sorry for your loss, Rachel. Seeing as how you were raised here and your family still lives here, I`m sure it’s a source of solace for all of you to be together. It must have been tough moving here from Chicago, starting all over again, especially under such circumstances. Are you glad to be back in Vegas, or would you prefer to be in Chicago or Florida?

I`m not too familiar with how newspapers are divided, in terms of workloads and organizational structure. Is “breaking news” synonymous with crime reporting? Is crime reporting your preferred focus, or just what you’re doing until you can pursue something else? Does being exposed to such tragedy on a daily basis take a toll on you? I can’t imagine it’s easy. In my almost twenty years in prison, I’ve been exposed to and subjected to many horrors, and such exposure is not without its costs. Trying to help others, though, somewhat minimizes those deleterious effects. As does trying to find the silver lining in the trials and tribulations of one’s own life.

You said that much of what was written in the papers twenty years ago, in relation to my case, was factual but dry. I would say the media coverage at the time was not a factual account of the case, but rather a blind recitation of the prosecution’s case that sought to sensationalize a tragedy. It was a daily polemic with the intent of turning all against one. Writers using clever words to set off the masses. I was a kid at the time, scared to death, absolutely horrified by what had happened. The media portrayed me as a monster, demonized me, when I was in fact a messed up kid full of self-loathing, a suicidal and selfish child bent on self-destruction without any consideration for the possibility of anyone else getting hurt during my quest for self-immolation.

Honestly, Rachel, I don`t think you can enter this conversation with no preconceived notions about me if you read the articles written about me from 1997-2000. If you read just those, didn`t talk to me at all, and took everything in those articles as a balanced and unbiased presentation, you would think I was one of the worst human beings in the world; you would think I was a callous, unfeeling, emotionless, psychopath. And if you thought that, you would be completely wrong.

Regardless of the lack of impartiality and fairness in the original coverage and proceedings, the reality is that I have spent the past twenty years being punished. You said you don`t know what it’s like to be in prison for 20 years, or to spend most of your adult life in prison. To be in prison for 20 years is to be in a living hell for two decades, and interminable suffering. The fact of the matter is that I have spent the whole of my adult life in prison, and over half of my total life in prison. When this happened in 1997, I was eighteen years old and still in high school. I was no more of an adult than my seventeen-year-old peers. I was actually less of an adult than them, as I had almost no impulse-control; I was mentally, emotionally, and psychologically immature; and I gave almost no thought to the consequences of my actions. You recently got done with college, right? When you were an 18-year-old in your first year of college (or your senior year of high school), would you say you were a fully formed adult in complete control of yourself? Or would you say you made a lot of questionable choices and did things you would have done differently–or would not have done at all–as an adult today? Would you say that you entered the world fully matured the day you turned 18, or that you actually grew up and became a true adult during those four years in college? I came to prison a kid and became an adult in here.

Everyone does things in their youth that they reflect on later in life and regret. People also do things–especially when they’re younger–that are contrary to who they are as human beings. Those rash decisions and actions of youth have lasting effects on both ourselves and those around us, though those effects aren’t so completely irreversible, devastating, and tragic as the death of an innocent child. Three kids went into that bathroom stall twenty years ago: two lost their lives and one walked away completely unscathed. While Dave Cash couldn`t have cared less about Sherrice Iverson, my heart was broken by what happened and still is.  I’ve paid with my life for what happened that night. But no matter how many years I’ve spent in prison, no matter how many years I spend in prison, no matter how much I suffer, nothing can bring Sherrice back. If I could trade places with Sherrice, I would. I spent years crying out into the universe to let me trade places with her, to let me change what happened. If I could change it, I would. I wish I could give my life–or do something, anything–to give Sherrice back to her family unharmed and unscathed. But you can’t go back, no matter how badly you wish you could.

I literally went years without smiling after this happened, suffering a daily torment, both internally and externally. Though I was demonized by the media, my contrition at the time was genuine, and still is. Now my soul has been scoured by the tribulations of time. After I had spent years in solitary confinement in supermax Ely State Prison–years of introspection, self-flagellation, and sadness–I was almost murdered in 2004. After my broken shoulder, fractured arm, and shotgun-blast wounds to my face and head healed, I had the epiphany that sitting in a small cell by myself with a shattered soul, doing nothing but hating myself, was a senseless and selfish form of self-pity. It was at that point that I committed–truly committed–to making the world a better place, of doing everything I could to improve myself and the world around me. I owed–and owe–that to Sherrice, her family, and society. I owe it to Sherrice to honor her memory with actions that make the world a better place and improve life for whoever I can improve it for.

I have lots of ideas, plans, dreams, and hopes for making the world a better place: I have my heart set entirely on making the world a better place. In everyday life I try to focus on our similarities as human beings, not our differences. I have an unalloyed idealism, a belief that no matter what mistakes we make, no matter what harm we have caused in the world, everyone is capable of change, everyone is capable of doing good, being the agent of positive change in the world. I try to put a smile on my face each day to show the guys around me that no matter how egregious your actions in the past, and no matter how much time you have, you can still pursue the positive. You can still have hope. You can still accomplish good things in the world.

I’ve seen a lot of youngsters come into prison over the years, and I try to be a positive influence on them, try to get them to be less impulsive, to think about their actions. Prison is an angry, hateful, paranoid place most of the time, where everyone is your enemy. I try to defuse that blind malevolence in the hopes of making life more bearable for those around me, as well as in the hopes of evincing the goodness inside each of these guys so they’ll go back into the world with hopeful and helpful hearts instead of hearts filled with anger and bitterness. If you’re given a second chance at life, a chance to atone for the harm you’ve caused others, take it and don`t squander it.

When I was imprisoned at Lovelock Correction Center, I advocated for my fellow prisoners and for a more change-based prison system. My efforts were met with an obstinate aversion to change. My pursuit of greater educational opportunities, and programs for making prisoners better people and citizens, resulted in my being the target of a conspiracy by some guards and administrators there. Some guards got another inmate to assault me, and then one guard falsified her report of the attack to get me thrown in solitary confinement for years. Then the Inspector General helped cover it up. If you want all the details, you can look at case number PI14-0905 in Pershing County, case number 3:14-CV-00661-RCJ-WGC in the U.S. District Court and 9th Circuit case number 15-16147. I am currently pursuing a full audit of the Office of the Inspector General here in Nevada because it is a secret police arm of the NDOC that publicly states a commitment to the truth and justice while actively protecting and covering up for the corrupt NDOC employees and their illegal actions. I`m enclosing some documents related to that. Note the NDOC “Complaint Guide”(the sections I’ve highlighted) and the official NDOC response to my official complaint against three of the conspirators (page three of Grievance number 2006-29-61740) where I’ve highlighted it. The contradiction between what they espouse publicly and what they do privately behind prison walls is downright Orwellian. If you search the Nevada Revised Statutes(as I’ve done), you will find there are no laws creating or governing the IG–only laws giving the IG and its employees police powers with no oversight.

You said the NDOC wouldn’t let you come see me. That is part of a commitment to secrecy and complete lack of transparency by the NDOC, which was previously reported on by the Review-Journal. They blatantly violate Nevada’s open records laws and criminal records laws for the purpose of protecting corrupt guards and administrators from any accountability. The third document I’ve enclosed details that. I believe transparency is absolutely necessary to the effective and efficient functioning of the criminal justice system (and the government as a whole), so that’s something I`m currently pursuing in the hope of improving the system here in Nevada to reduce crime and recidivism for all Nevadans. If that’s a story you would be interested in, I`ll provide whatever information about it you want. If not, can you refer it to one of your investigative journalist colleagues? Each year countless ex-guards and ex-administrators(as well as spouses and relatives of current guards and administrators)of the NDOC have salaries paid by Nevadans for those ex- and current employees to work as Inspector General employees who cover up corruption in the NDOC while publicly espousing a commitment to truth and justice.

As for my marriage, to say it’s a “happy marriage” is a misrepresentation: maintaining a marriage under these conditions is beyond difficult. I love my wife with all my heart, and I give my all to making her happy, to making her life better. She gave me a chance, took the time to get to know me and let me be my true self: caring, nurturing, and focused on the positive in life. Love is the most powerful force in the world and can heal the deepest wounds. We provide each other solace in what can be a harsh world. Though we may share moments of mirth and levity, this situation is a heartbreaking one that is emotionally devastating most days. She constantly inspires me to be a better man.

I hope this helps you, Rachel. I don`t know if it’s possible or not, but if it is, can you ask Sherrice’s family if I can send them a letter through you? I want to ask for their forgiveness, and I want them to know I would give anything to trade places with Sherrice. I just want them to know I am sorry, more sorry than words can ever say. I wish nothing but peace and good lives for them wherein their lives are not defined by this horrible tragedy as mine has been. Forgiveness, that is the question. I just want them to know that the man I am today is not the boy I was twenty years ago. I have changed, I have suffered, and I pursue positive change in the world every day. Nothing I can say or do will make up for the loss of Sherrice in this world, but I have to try.

Thank you for your time, Rachel. I hope that I will hear back from you, that we can continue this conversation so that you can know the boy I was twenty years ago and the man I am today. However, my idealism and pursuit of the positive do not blind me to reality. I know this may be nothing more than a one-off assignment for you, so if I don`t ever hear from you again, I wish you all the best in your life and career, and I hope that you will use your position in the press as a force for good and pursuing the positive for both yourself and the world around you.

Sincerely,

Jeremy Strohmeyer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Government for the people?

Soundtrack for this post: Rage Against the Machine.

An anti-government populist wave washed Donald Trump up onto the White House lawn, which is ironic because the Donald is for the regular American like ISIS is for democracy. To the people who voted for Trump: do you realize he is a billionaire whose almost every action has been for the benefit of fellow billionaires, and he doesn’t give a fuck about you or your lot in life? Now don`t get me wrong: I`m pro-business and all for smaller government, but I`m also hyper-aware of the plight of the average American. A lot of white males (and females, too, but more the males in this instance) feel like they’ve missed out on the economic recovery of the past eight years, and a few of those white males blame minorities–particularly Mexicans–for their own economic malaise. So racism comes to the surface and parades itself as nationalism. Sadly, those same people indoctrinated with racist views and beliefs don`t realize the racism is just a tool to keep them focused on–and fighting against–other people of limited financial means, and to keep them from seeing the true source of their oppression: the top 1%(aka Donald Trump). Sorry, guys: you were sold a bogus bill of goods and now you’re going to be grist for the mill to make the Trumpster richer. Make America great again? Nope. Make the top 1% richer (again). By the way, guys, unless you’re Native American, you’re all descended from immigrants.

Up until a few years ago, as envisioned by our Founders who bled for us, our intellectual property system (patents, trademarks, and copyrights) was a “first to invent” system, meaning that if you were the first to invent something, it was your intellectual property. If some deep-pocketed corporation saw your invention, stole it, and spent the thousands of dollars it takes to secure a legally solid patent, you had the recourse of being able to sue that corporation, prove you invented it first, and be given the financial value of that invention. Well, Congress, in their ever-loving quest to make the rich richer and fuck the little guy more, switched America to a “first to file” system. Now it doesn’t matter if you are the first to invent something. A corporation can steal your invention, patent it, and–bam–you just lost all your intellectual property. All because after hundreds of years, Congress switched us to a first to file system. If you can’t afford thousands for a patent, your invention isn’t yours. Thankfully copyrights are still a first to invent system.

That’s bad enough, because now Google can steal your ideas (because no doubt every modern inventor uses Google to research inventions) by having one of their deep-learning artificial intelligence algorithms store and study every little thing you do on your computer, laptop, and/or smartphone. But, hey, the government wouldn`t let a company enslave us like that, oppress us like that, would they? Maybe not before, but now elections are bought. “Before what?” you ask. Citizens United. What’s that, you ask? Well, about two years ago the U.S. Supreme Court gave billionaires carte blanche to spend as much as they want to control elections, in the name of “free speech”. Wouldn`t want to impinge on the billionaires of the world and their freedom of speech. That fundamental and cataclysmic shift in campaign finance law was decided in the Citizens United case. Now if you don`t have the money, your voice won’t be heard. All you will hear and read–on tv, in newspapers, on the radio, and on the internet–is what the billionaires want you to hear and read.

Now here’s how the Trumpster and his fellow billionaires (here’s looking at you, Koch brothers), and the Supreme Court deference to those billionaires’ freedom of speech, are about to seriously fuck my freedom of speech–and thus my ire at the current state of affairs. Trump put a Republican named Ajit Pai in charge of the FCC. How does that affect my freedom of speech, you ask? Well, today every American out there on the streets takes for granted the fact that they can pick up their phones and make unlimited calls to any other American for free. Wanna gab for two hours with your buddy in New York? Free. Calls made in prison? Far from free.

When I first came to prison about twenty years ago, it cost about $30 to make one single fifteen-minute call to California. Yes, $2 a minute (at least) for a call from Nevada to California. It wasn’t until about a year ago, when the FCC voted to cap prison phone rates that calls dropped to about eleven cents a minute. Still far from free, but affordable. Hell, affordable is a stretch, but it’s better than $2 a minute. It took about twenty years of petitioning and legal battles to finally get the FCC to act on the issue. The billionaires and their phone companies who like to profit off of the weakest and poorest of society immediately filed legal challenges to that rate cap on prison calls. God forbid they make only 11 cents a minute off of inmates and their familiar instead of some higher amount. By the way, the typical market forces wherein competition would lower prices over time don`t apply to the prison industrial complex because it’s a pay-to-play system. Every dollar scraped off the backs of prisoners’ friends and families has a percentage of it kicked back to the prison and its administrators. Whoever offers the biggest kickback gets the contract. What does it matter if you’re kicking back 60% of every dollar when you can charge whatever you want because you have a (literally) captive market and no legal limits on price-gouging?

So, the FCC finally capped the rates and the billionaires and their lackeys filed their legal challenges. Trump got elected, Trump put another billionaire’s lackey in charge of the FCC, and–drumroll, please–the FCC suddenly stopped defending their rate cap in court. Now the FCC is on the side of the billionaire phone companies, and non-profits and civic-minded lawyers have to protect and defend the FCC’s rate cap against the FCC. If (or more likely when) the prison phone rate caps are eliminated, I won’t be able to call my family and friends as much as I do now, extremely curtailing my freedom of speech. But the billionaires can buy elections under the guise of making sure their freedom of speech isn`t infringed upon. At what point do those billionaires become tyrants? At what point does the tree of liberty need to be watered again? Again, don`t get me wrong: I have nothing against billionaires. Hell, I aspire to become one. But when those billionaires buy elections in order to oppress the middle and lower classes, they are abusing the power their wealth gives them, and when the government consists of billionaire lackeys instead of duly elected representatives of the people, something’s gotta give. Like Rage said: Know your enemy.

Obviously the whole phone rate thing affects me directly, but it’s not yet so obvious how the first to file patent system affects me. That’s because I haven’t posted my inventions yet. I have over a hundred pages of inventions, business models, and business ideas from the last sixteen years, and I`m going to post every one of them here. Right now I am working on getting one of my inventions patented: lucky for me, I have an awesome, generous cousin who is helping me with that. If not for him, I would never be able to get a patent filed due to the prohibitive cost. When I post each of my inventions, I`ll be giving away my intellectual property for free. A lot of my inventions that may have been wholly unique and original at the time were invented and/or marketed by others between then and now. Some of the ideas, no matter when I invented them, have not been thought of or produced by anyone yet. However, as I truly believe inventions inexorably make the world a better place, if anyone uses any of my ideas and gets them to market, I`ll be glad, regardless of remuneration.

Alright, rant’s over. My next post will be some of my inventions. Until next time, then, keep your eyes open and don`t eat the pabulum they feed you: it’s soylent green.

Battle Against Corruption: finally a victory

As I’ve talked about in this blog before, corruption is systemic at Lovelock Correctional Center and I was a victim of that corruption. I have been battling against that corruption in the court system for the past few years. I don`t need to rehash everything here, so suffice to say I had to file a brief with the Ninth Circuit because the U.S. District Court dismissed all of my civil claims against Lovelock and NDOC (Nevada Department of Corrections). The Ninth Circuit just issued a judgement in my favor, stating that my rights were in fact violated and kicked it back down to the lower court for further proceedings. For anyone who wants to read the actual order, click below.

I`m going to be extremely busy with this over the next couple of months, so I may not be posting as frequently as before. Then again, I was a bit slow with my posts anyway, wasn’t I? It’s nice to see a little bit of justice from time to time. Persistence pays off. Never give up, never surrender.

15-16147

Jeremy Strohmeyer v. K. Belanger